Big Bang Falsey

There is a misconception among pseudo scientist that like to claim the BBT is a theory about existence itself. They are not ambitious or knowledgeable enough to be a real scientist, so they sit on forums and news groups on the internet debating with crowds of people who would not know any better. They get a sense of being smart.

I am not a scientist, however when I want to learn something I do not turn to fake scientist sitting on the internet. I've picked up a few books with mathematics and language I really do not understand. What I have realized is we have dumbed down the Big Bang Theory to the point it is not even accurate. We have done so in order for the fake scientist to be able to talk about this theory and sound smart. We have turned it into something they are able to understand and explain to people like me.

Big Bang Theory is not a Theory of existence. It does not say, there was nothing and then matter exploded making our universe. In fact it says the complete opposite.

What the Theory really says i the universe was very condense. It was filled with matter. It was very hot. Something causes that matter to expand over space, making it cool down in the process. We are in a universe that is expanding and cooling down. BBT is by no means a theory about existence itself, more a theory on how our universe formed into what it is today. It is not the origin of life. It also is not tied in with biological evolution. Truth is no consensus has been reached on ideas about the ultimate origin of the universe.

That sums it up simply. Now there are all kinds of equations and theories about radiation, dark matter, speed, energy and light that honestly I do not understand. In fact I have come to the conclusion it is so complex that only a small percentage of people could actually understand such concepts and ideas. The problem is the internet is filled with pseudo scientist who don't fully understand it themselves, but they have a motive to get people to think as they think, so they preach concepts of BBT without even really understand BBT. It is an effective practice of theirs because honestly who knows enough to better argue with them? This is the problem when the goal of science is to prove a group of people wrong, rather than having a goal of discovering the workings of the universe.